We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • GMPs
    • FDA Enforcement Actions
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Drug Weekly
    • FDAnews
  • Device News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • FDA Enforcement Actions
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Device Weekly
    • FDAnews
  • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Drug Books
    • Device Books
  • Training/Events
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Form 483s Database
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • White Papers
  • CenterWatch
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • FDAnews Editorial Board
    • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Congressmen Fault FDA, Aventis, IRB in Ketek Study

Congressmen Fault FDA, Aventis, IRB in Ketek Study

February 13, 2008

The FDA, Aventis, a contract research organization and an institutional review board (IRB) all failed to report or investigate fraud committed in a clinical trial of Aventis’ antibiotic Ketek, a House subcommittee charged.

The House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee hearing focused on Study 3014 of Ketek (telithromycin) and the fraud committed by clinical investigator Anne Kirkman-Campbell, who is serving a 57-month prison sentence for falsifying study data.

Three FDA criminal investigators testified in detail about their investigation of Kirkman-Campbell’s site. One investigator said he had asked for support from the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and the FDA’s Division of Scientific Investigations but did not receive the backing he needed.

When the FDA was preparing to audit Kirkman-Campbell’s site, Ann Marie Cisneros, a former clinical research associate at contract research organization Pharmaceutical Product Development (PPD), said, “I was told by a trusted and distressed former colleague at PPD that Nadine Grethe, project manager at Aventis, coached Dr. Kirkman-Campbell on how to explain away some of the site irregularities. I was called on two occasions by PPD lawyers who reminded me of the confidentiality agreement I signed and advised me not to speak with the FDA without Aventis’ approval and PPD attorneys present.”

Although PPD did inform Aventis and the Copernicus Group IRB, it did not inform the FDA of the problems it observed at Kirkman-Campbell’s site “due to contractual obligations with Aventis and disagreement over whether there had been fraud or violations of standard operating procedures,” Fred Eshelman, CEO of PPD, testified.

 

    Upcoming Events

    • 28Sep

      The Cost of Counterfeiting: Why You Need a Plan to Secure Your Medical Device Supply Chain

    • 28Sep

      Calculating Sample Size to Satisfy FDA Expectations

    • 11Oct

      GMP Quality Management vSummit 2023: Where Quality Meets Risk

    • 16Oct

      MAGI@home Clinical Research Conference 2023

    • 26Oct

      FDA in 2024: What to Expect in an Election Year

    • 08Nov

      18th Annual FDA Inspections vSummit

    Featured Products

    • FDA, FTC and DOJ Enforcement of Medical Device Regulations

      FDA, FTC and DOJ Enforcement of Medical Device Regulations

    • Using Real-World Evidence in Drug and Device Submissions

      Using Real-World Evidence in Drug and Device Submissions

    Featured Stories

    • Manufacturing Cost is Key Issue Facing Gene Therapy Products, Marks Says

    • Artificial Womb Technology Not Yet Ready for Human Trials Adcomm Says

    • Top Concern for CBER is Marketing of Unapproved Biologics, Says FDA Official

    • FDA Deems Medline Industries’ Saline Solution Vial Recall as Class 1

    The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

    Learn More
    • Drug Products
      • Quality
      • Regulatory Affairs
      • GMPs
      • Inspections and Audits
      • Postmarket Safety
      • Submissions and Approvals
      • Research and Development
      • Commercial Operations
    • Device Products
      • Quality
      • Regulatory Affairs
      • QSR
      • Inspections and Audits
      • Postmarket Safety
      • Submissions and Approvals
      • Research and Development
      • Commercial Operations
    • Clinical Products
      • Trial Design
      • Data Integrity
      • GCP
      • Inspections and Audits
      • Transparency
    • Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
    Footer Logo

    300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

    Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

    Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing