We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug Products
    • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Subscription Newsletters
    • Free Newsletters
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • Device Products
    • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Subscription Newsletters
    • Free Newsletters
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • Clinical Products
  • Advertising
  • White Papers
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » EU, Japan Say QbD Critical to Developing Drugs with Nanotechnology

EU, Japan Say QbD Critical to Developing Drugs with Nanotechnology

January 10, 2014

Because nanosized solubilizers known as block copolymer micelles (BCM) contain highly functional polymers, drugmakers that use them are recommended to apply quality-by-design (QbD) principles within a “well-defined manufacturing process” to ensure consistent quality.

Simply testing the finished product is insufficient to define”quality,” as small changes to drugs containing BCMs may significantly influence their performance, reads a joint paper published Friday by the European Medicines Agency and Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.

Sponsors of new drugs are increasingly turning to BCMs because they are believed to improve delivery of poorly soluble, highly toxic or unstable drugs, the regulators say. However, the potential for BCMs to accumulate in solid tumors requires manufacturing controls robust enough to minimize their potential safety and efficacy impacts in all proposed applications, they add.

The regulators’ guidance focuses primarily on products that intravenously deliver active substances in the form of compounds, nucleic acids and biologics such as peptides and proteins.

The regulators urge sponsors of BCM-containing drugs to seek early dialogue to discuss the technology and any emerging methods that might be used to define quality, the paper states.

Drugmakers’ non-clinical pharmacodynamic studies should include demonstration of pharmacodynamic response in appropriately justified in vitro (where possible) and in vivo models. In vivo evaluations should involve an appropriate administration pathway, acceptable dose levels and a justified dosing regimen depending on the proposed application, the paper says.

The starting dose for first-in-human studies should remain compliant with both ICH M3(R2)and regional guidelines, and follow careful consideration of all related non-clinical data, including:

  • Critical product attributes;
  • Pharmacological dose-response;
  • Pharmacokinetics; and
  • Pharmacological/toxicological profiles.

Data showing a consistency in quality should be provided, as should details about the sponsor’s controls for critical steps and intermediates, the regulators say. The sources and specifications for starting materials and intermediates should be submitted as well.

Experience with BCMs is currently limited, with most BCM-containing drug candidates in pre-clinical or early-stage clinical development. The emerging candidates are mostly oncology drugs.

View the joint recommendations at www.fdanews.com/ext/resources/files/01/01-13-14-EMApaper.pdf. — Johnathan Rickman

Pharmaceuticals Regulatory Affairs Research and Development

Upcoming Events

  • 26Jan

    Reducing Complexity in Starting Clinical Trials – More Patients, Faster Startup

  • 27Jan

    Medical Device Clinical Trials in China: Latest Regulatory Developments

  • 27Jan

    FDA’s Response to COVID-19: Fundamentals of Obtaining Emergency Use Authorizations

  • 09Feb

    Maintaining Your Risk-Based Cleaning and Disinfectant Programs: Best Practices During COVID-19

  • 10Feb

    FDA Under the Biden Administration: What’s to Come and What It Will Mean

  • 11Feb

    Lab X.0: Addressing Quality and Compliance Challenges in Laboratory Operations in the COVID-19 All-Digital Era

Featured Products

  • Biological Risk Evaluation and Management for Medical Devices

  • GMP Inspection Preparation Checklist: A Tool for Internal Auditing

Featured Stories

  • CE mark

    MiRXES Earns CE Mark for COVID-19/Flu Test

  • KitePharma_Logo

    Kite Pharma’s Tecartus Gains UK Recommendation for Lymphoma

  • Eli Lilly logo

    Lilly’s Monoclonal Antibody Could Prevent COVID-19 in the Elderly

  • CE mark

    Fluidigm Gains CE Mark for Saliva-Based Assay for COVID-19

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Fax 703.538.7676 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2021. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing