We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • GMPs, Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Drug Daily Bulletin
    • Drug Industry Daily
  • Device News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin Premium
  • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Drug Books
    • Device Books
  • Training/Events
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Form 483s Database
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • White Papers
  • CenterWatch
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Data Integrity and Recordkeeping Problems Prompt FDA Warning to Indian API Maker

Data Integrity and Recordkeeping Problems Prompt FDA Warning to Indian API Maker

November 14, 2014

The FDA has slapped another Indian active pharmaceutical ingredient maker with a warning for data integrity weaknesses, including printing batch records from personal computers over which the company lacked adequate controls.

The batch record problem was one of several violations that the FDA cited in its warning letter to Sharp Global Limited that focused on the company’s failure to implement proper controls to ensure key quality data wasn’t manipulated or deleted. This is the 11th warning letter that the agency has issued in 2014 to manufacturers, primarily in India, that cite data integrity practices.

Sharp responded that it had changed its standard operating procedure for record controls in response to the findings. The company, however, failed to present evidence that all operators were trained on the revised SOP, according to the letter that resulted from a March inspection of the firm’s New Delhi, India, facility.

The FDA also found that the company’s gas chromatographs didn’t prevent the deletion or altering of raw data files, and lacked audit trails that record any changes to data, according to its Oct. 15 letter.

Sharp management told investigators that the company’s practice was to delete raw data files once the chromatograms were printed. Such records, however, are critical to support release testing, according to the FDA, which increasingly is looking for data integrity problems at sites, noting that one failure could cast doubt on all data generated by a facility.

In addition, the inspection found batch records related to non-U.S. products that weren’t completed or properly signed by quality control officials.

Furthermore, Sharp didn’t fully register all of its New Delhi facilities this year before trying to import products into the U.S., the agency found.

If Sharp doesn’t address the violations, the FDA said it could withhold approval of applications and supplements that cite the API maker as a supplier. The agency also threatened to slap an import alert on Sharp.

Failure to comply with FDA batch record review processes is among the Top Ten most frequent deficiencies cited during agency inspections of drug and biologics manufacturers, so purchase Mastering Batch Record Review.

Drugs GMPs Inspections and Audits Quality

Upcoming Events

  • 04Apr

    Optimizing Quality Control Operations with Unified Quality

  • 20Apr

    Medical Device Enforcement: Latest Developments from the FDA, DOJ and FTC

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 27Apr

    Califf’s FDA, 2023 and Beyond: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 17May

    2023 WCG Avoca Quality Consortium Summit

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • GrayMatters Health’s Digital Therapy Device for PTSD Cleared

  • Dupixent Shows Positive Results in COPD Study

  • Advamedica’s Hemostat Cleared for Severe Surgical Bleeding

  • FDA Approves Sandoz’s Citrate-Free Adalimubab Formulation

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing