We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Drug Daily Bulletin
    • Drug Industry Daily
  • Device News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin Premium
  • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Drug Books
    • Device Books
  • Training/Events
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Form 483s Database
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • White Papers
  • CenterWatch
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Mallinckrodt Sues FDA Over Equivalence Status Change on ADHD Generic

Mallinckrodt Sues FDA Over Equivalence Status Change on ADHD Generic

November 26, 2014

Mallinckrodt has sued the FDA over its decision to revoke the equivalence rating on the company’s generic version of Janssen’s attention deficit hyperactivity disorder drug Concerta.

The agency did so without prior notice or an opportunity for comment, in a violation of Mallinckrodt’s due process rights, the Irish drugmaker said in a complaint filed in Maryland federal court. The drugmaker asked for a temporary restraining order that would reverse the equivalence rating change pending a final ruling on the FDA’s decision.

The FDA decision to change the rating from AB interchangeable to BX, meaning the generic cannot automatically be swapped for branded Concerta (methylphenidate HCl), centered on concerns that the generics from Mallinckrodt and fellow drugmaker Kudco aren’t released at the same rate as the brand.

The move effectively took the companies’ versions off the market, Mallinckrodt said.
The problem, according to the lawsuit, is that the FDA cannot remove a product without an opportunity for a hearing, even when there are concerns for public health. Nor has the FDA furnished sufficient evidence to demonstrate that Mallinckrodt’s version is not effective, the firm added. 

In its lawsuit, Mallinckrodt continues to maintain that its version of Concerta, launched December 2012, is safe and effective. The firm reiterates prior assertions that there have been just 68 confirmed adverse events over a lack of efficacy when patients switched from branded Concerta to its generic. That’s compared with more than 88 million doses of Mallinckrodt’s version that have been prescribed.

The FDA changed its equivalence findings for the therapies six days after it issued a new draft guidance on bioequivalence testing for Concerta generics. At the time of the status change, the agency noted that it had found efficacy issues in nearly 200 adverse event reports on Mallinckrodt’s version.

Mallinckrodt also expressed concerns that the removal of its version and Kudco’s could create shortages. The only other approved generic version of Concerta is one from Janssen, which the FDA said did not experience similar equivalence issues.

The FDA’s stated policy is to not comment on pending litigation. — Bryan Koenig

Originally appeared in Drug Industry Daily, the pharmaceutical industry’s number one source for regulatory news and information. Click here for more information.

Drugs Regulatory Affairs

Upcoming Events

  • 04Apr

    Optimizing Quality Control Operations with Unified Quality

  • 12Apr

    The Patient Playbook Webinar Series, Part 3 — Rethinking the Development of Participant-Centric Clinical Trial Technology

  • 20Apr

    Medical Device Enforcement: Latest Developments from the FDA, DOJ and FTC

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 26Apr

    Building the Foundation for QMS AI

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • Surmodics Gets FDA’s Feedback on Rejected PMA

  • EU Approves Amicus Therapeutics Pombiliti for Late-Onset Pompe Disease

  • FDA Final Order Requires PMA for Spinal Spheres

  • FDA and Lupus Research Alliance Form Drug Development Consortium

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing