We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • GMPs, Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Drug Daily Bulletin
    • Drug Industry Daily
  • Device News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin Premium
  • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Drug Books
    • Device Books
  • Training/Events
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Form 483s Database
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • White Papers
  • CenterWatch
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Cincinnati Device Developer Hit for Complaint Handling, CAPA Issues

Cincinnati Device Developer Hit for Complaint Handling, CAPA Issues

June 15, 2018

The FDA handed MHC Medical Products a Form 483 after its January inspection revealed multiple deficiencies at its Cincinnati, Ohio facility, including poor complaint handling and management, CAPA issues and procedural shortcomings.

The agency found that the firm did not promptly look into complaints that were MDR reportable. Complaints involving needles breaking off into customers’ stomachs and another complaint regarding a faulty glucose meter were not reported as MDRs and did not have a documented review or evaluation for reportability.

In addition, the firm did not investigate other, less severe complaints, such as ones involving a needle not ejecting liquid, ripped syringe bags and missing needle tops, and the company’s complaint standard operating procedures did not define the firm’s defect codes.

The company also did not adequately define how to analyze its quality sources. Its SOP said that data would be collected, analyzed and reviewed at least quarterly, but it did not define how the analysis should be conducted. There was also no direct link between the data analysis and the firm’s CAPA system.

The firm’s supply chain manager also said the firm had no approved procedure for reviewing its contract manufacturer’s quality control reports or the documentation of the reviews, both of which are used to determine the release of products.

The company’s quality audits were missing documentation. Although an executive claimed that a quality audit was conducted in 2013 by an outside firm and in early 2017 by its current quality systems contractor, there were no records of either audit.

MHC also failed to keep records that included all consultants and contracting services used by the firm. Its current quality system consultant and the independent test laboratory used for investigations were not on its approved suppliers list.

View today's stories

Devices Inspections and Audits

Upcoming Events

  • 04Apr

    Optimizing Quality Control Operations with Unified Quality

  • 20Apr

    Medical Device Enforcement: Latest Developments from the FDA, DOJ and FTC

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 27Apr

    Califf’s FDA, 2023 and Beyond: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 17May

    2023 WCG Avoca Quality Consortium Summit

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • GrayMatters Health’s Digital Therapy Device for PTSD Cleared

  • Dupixent Shows Positive Results in COPD Study

  • Advamedica’s Hemostat Cleared for Severe Surgical Bleeding

  • FDA Approves Sandoz’s Citrate-Free Adalimubab Formulation

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing