We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug & Device Products
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Publications
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • Books
  • Clinical Products
  • Advertising
  • White Papers
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » California Bill Would Impose First State Ban on Pay-For-Delay Deals

California Bill Would Impose First State Ban on Pay-For-Delay Deals

correct_handshake.gif
February 27, 2019

A bill introduced in the California legislature and endorsed by the state’s attorney general would ban controversial “pay-for-delay” deals between branded and generic drugmakers.

If the bill passes, California would become the first state to ban pay-for-delay deals. AB 824, introduced by Jim Wood (D-2nd District), would ban any agreement in which a drugmaker transfers anything of value to stall research, marketing or sale of a competitor’s drug.

The bill would treat such agreements as inherently anticompetitive and bar all involved parties from withholding evidence regarding such arrangements.

“When drug companies use these quiet pay-for-delay agreements with generic drug manufacturers it hurts consumers twice — once by delaying the introduction of an equivalent generic drug that is almost always cheaper than the brand name and again by stifling additional competition when multiple generic companies begin producing even less expensive generic equivalents,” Wood said.

View today's stories

Pharmaceuticals Regulatory Affairs

Upcoming Events

  • 01Feb

    The Future of QMS: Will the Recent Announcement and Delays Have a Global Impact?

  • 08Feb

    Process and Design Validation for Devicemakers: A Deep Dive into Best Practices, Recent Trends and Regulatory Definitions

  • 09Feb

    The Inextricable Link Between Data Integrity and Quality Culture

  • 15Feb

    Advanced Compliance Writing CAPA: Mastering Failure Investigation and Root Cause Analysis

  • 16Feb

    Fundamentals of FDA Inspection Management: Reduce Anxiety, Increase Inspection Success

  • 22Feb

    Best Practices for Developing and Maintaining a GxP Training Matrix

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • NeuroMetrix Launches DPNCheck 2.0 for Peripheral Neuropathy Screening

  • Syros Gets Fast Track Status for Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Candidate

  • FDA Approves Abbott’s Spinal Cord Stimulation System for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

  • FDA Expands Approval for Merck’s Keytruda in NSCLC

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing