We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug & Device Products
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Publications
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • Books
  • Clinical Products
  • Advertising
  • White Papers
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » IP Think Tank Cautions Against Breaking Gilead’s Truvada Patent

IP Think Tank Cautions Against Breaking Gilead’s Truvada Patent

March 21, 2019

As HIV patient advocates urge the federal government to “break” drug patents in an effort to lower the prices of HIV drugs, an intellectual property think tank cautioned that the tactic could backfire.

The advocacy group PrEP4All recently called on the government to invoke the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act’s “march-in” provision, which would allow licenses to be revoked for patented inventions in specific circumstances. Such a step, the organization claims, is necessary to introduce generic versions of Gilead’s Truvada (emtricitabine/tenofovir), which is the only form of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) approved by the FDA. The drug’s average retail price is almost $2,000 per dose.

In a new report, the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) expressed concerns about such a move, warning that the proposal contradicts the intent of the statute and would result in fewer new drugs.

View today's stories

Pharmaceuticals Regulatory Affairs

Upcoming Events

  • 09Feb

    The Inextricable Link Between Data Integrity and Quality Culture

  • 15Feb

    Advanced Compliance Writing CAPA: Mastering Failure Investigation and Root Cause Analysis

  • 16Feb

    Fundamentals of FDA Inspection Management: Reduce Anxiety, Increase Inspection Success

  • 22Feb

    Best Practices for Developing and Maintaining a GxP Training Matrix

  • 07Mar

    FDA’s Remote Assessments v. Remote Interactive Evaluations: Do You Really Know the Difference?

  • 08Mar

    Medical Device Cybersecurity: The Regulatory Landscape and How to Defend Your Practices During an Inspection

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • Boston Scientific’s Single Use Ureteroscope Gets FDA Clearance

  • Gilead’s Trodelvy Gets Expanded Approval in Breast Cancer

  • AI Software to Improve Echocardiogram Images Gets FDA Clearance

  • Rocket Pharmaceuticals Gets RMAT Designation for Danon Disease Gene Therapy

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing