We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug & Device Products
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Publications
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • Books
  • Clinical Products
  • Advertising
  • White Papers
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Drugmaker Comments on FDA Guidance on Natural Histories for Rare Diseases

Drugmaker Comments on FDA Guidance on Natural Histories for Rare Diseases

June 3, 2019

Ionis offered feedback on the FDA’s guidance for developing natural history studies for rare disease drug development, praising some parts of the guidance but calling for more details.

Ionis suggested that the agency add three additional uses for natural history studies to the guidance—establishing the burden of disease, characterizing genetic mutations and biological consequences, and reducing trial burden in interventional studies.

The guidance should strongly encourage sponsors share with the public and community “not only methods, practical aspects and results, but also subject-level data in a timely fashion,” the drugmaker said. It also called for greater emphasis on interim analyses.

“Sponsors should be encouraged to adapt and revise their natural history study protocols based on ongoing data analysis and learnings to ensure the collection of most relevant natural history data,” Ionis said.

View today's stories

Pharmaceuticals Regulatory Affairs

Upcoming Events

  • 09Feb

    The Inextricable Link Between Data Integrity and Quality Culture

  • 15Feb

    Advanced Compliance Writing CAPA: Mastering Failure Investigation and Root Cause Analysis

  • 16Feb

    Fundamentals of FDA Inspection Management: Reduce Anxiety, Increase Inspection Success

  • 22Feb

    Best Practices for Developing and Maintaining a GxP Training Matrix

  • 07Mar

    FDA’s Remote Assessments v. Remote Interactive Evaluations: Do You Really Know the Difference?

  • 08Mar

    Medical Device Cybersecurity: The Regulatory Landscape and How to Defend Your Practices During an Inspection

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • Boston Scientific’s Single Use Ureteroscope Gets FDA Clearance

  • Gilead’s Trodelvy Gets Expanded Approval in Breast Cancer

  • AI Software to Improve Echocardiogram Images Gets FDA Clearance

  • Rocket Pharmaceuticals Gets RMAT Designation for Danon Disease Gene Therapy

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing