We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug & Device Products
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Publications
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • Books
  • Clinical Products
  • Advertising
  • White Papers
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » FDA Ponders New Approach for Opioid Risk-Benefit Assessments

FDA Ponders New Approach for Opioid Risk-Benefit Assessments

FDA_Logo_Black_2016.gif
June 27, 2019

Sponsors of opioid drugs would have to study whether their candidates are better than currently approved drugs under new guidelines the FDA is considering.

In a new draft guidance, the FDA calls for sponsors to answer questions about the broader public health effects of new opioid applications and rescinds a 2014 draft guidance on analgesics. The agency says it plans to “provide more targeted information in critical areas of development using a series of new draft guidances to speed development.”

With the new draft guidance, and a scheduled public meeting on Sept. 17, regulators hope they can bring balance to these questions. “The agency will consider the benefits and risks of proposed new opioid analgesics relative to other already approved opioid and non-opioid analgesics,” FDA Acting Commissioner Ned Sharpless and CDER Deputy Director Douglas Throckmorton said in a joint statement.

“In terms of patient safety, the agency recommends that companies consider providing information on whether their drug has any characteristics that would mitigate the risks of overdose, abuse or the development of addiction,” Sharpless and Throckmorton said.

View today's stories

Pharmaceuticals Regulatory Affairs

Upcoming Events

  • 08Sep

    Organizing Data and Document Archives: Finding a Needle in a Haystack for FDA Inspections

  • 15Sep

    Califf’s Post-PDUFA, Post-COVID FDA Agenda: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 20Sep

    Building a World-Class Pharmaceutical Advertising and Promotion Review Program

  • 21Sep

    The FDA’s Focus on Clinical Data Integrity Throughout Product Development and Approval

  • 22Sep

    FDA’s New Quality Management System Regulation: What the Proposed Harmonization with ISO 13485 Means for Devicemakers

  • 11Oct

    1st Annual Quality Management vSummit

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • AngioDynamics Gets Expanded Clearance for Auryon Atherectomy System

  • Aura Biosciences Receives Fast Track Designation for Bladder Cancer Candidate

  • FDA Issues Update on Becton Dickinson’s Recall

  • FDA Grants Accelerated Approval to Enhertu for HER2-Mutant NSCLC

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2022. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing