Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its subsidiary Ethicon are seeking a review by the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) of the $302 million in imposed on them for misrepresenting the risk of their pelvic mesh products in marketing materials, arguing their due process rights were violated.
To View This Article:
Subscribe To Device Daily Bulletin Premium
Device Daily Bulletin Premium Subscription
Upgrade to Device Daily Bulletin Premium to get all the articles in the free publication PLUS more in-depth stories on regulatory and industry developments, FDA inspection and enforcement activities and analysis of market trends. It makes sense of everything successful devicemakers must know and do, delivering the news, analysis and interpretation of industry changes you need to stay compliant and thrive. And it’s combined with timely content from FDAnews management reports and webinars. Learn more