We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Drug Daily Bulletin
    • Drug Industry Daily
  • Device News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin Premium
  • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Drug Books
    • Device Books
  • Training/Events
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Form 483s Database
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • White Papers
  • CenterWatch
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Foul API Batches and Data Integrity Issues Result in FDA Warning for Cadila

Foul API Batches and Data Integrity Issues Result in FDA Warning for Cadila

November 19, 2014

The FDA has cited Cadila Pharmaceuticals for poor data integrity practices and sloppy investigations into foul smelling batches of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), violations that the agency threatened could result in an import alert.

The agency’s warning letter stems from an inspection of Cadila’s Guajarat, India, facility in March that found since 2011 the company had failed to properly investigate product complaints and make changes to prevent problems from recurring.

The FDA letter citied several data integrity problems at the plant, an area that has received heightened scrutiny from investigators.

For example, an audit trail that can show who accesses the gas chromatography unit has been available since 2009, but wasn’t used until October 2013. Instruments such as an ultraviolet spectrophotometer also were connected to stand-alone computers instead of to a network, and Cadila didn’t have back-up systems for the devices, according to the FDA’s Oct. 15 letter.

Investigators also discovered a backlog of samples that needed to be tested for stability, a repeat observation from a 2012 inspection.

In another violation, the FDA observed that Cadila had received a complaint in September 2011 of a foul smelling batch of APIs, which the company attributed to a control for an impurity, but didn’t provide specifics. The FDA found the firm’s investigation into the matter didn’t include data to support such a claim and offered no assurance that changes to the manufacturing process regarding the control were related to the odor issue.

Less than a year later, Cadila received the same complaint about another batch of foul APIs. In addition to the odor problem, the batch failed tests for maximum impurity levels, according to the FDA. Cadila once again blamed the unpleasant odor on a process impurity, but again failed to provide enough data to back that conclusion up, said the letter.

The FDA openly questioned whether Cadila has an effective quality system, and warned that failure to make a turnaround could result in holds on any new applications or supplements that list Cadila as an API supplier. The agency also could slap Cadila with an import alert, effectively preventing the manufacturer from shipping API to the U.S.

Cadila has already faced quality problems earlier this year, recalling more than 10,000 bottles of antihistamine due to a drug mix-up.

The drugmaker was not available for comment.

To read the warning letter, visit www.fdanews.com/11-11-14-CadilaWarning.pdf. — Robert King

Upcoming Events

  • 04Apr

    Optimizing Quality Control Operations with Unified Quality

  • 20Apr

    Medical Device Enforcement: Latest Developments from the FDA, DOJ and FTC

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 27Apr

    Califf’s FDA, 2023 and Beyond: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 17May

    2023 WCG Avoca Quality Consortium Summit

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • Wesper Next-Generation Device Cleared for Sleep Test Data Collection

  • FDA Approves First-Ever Treatment for Activated Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Delta Syndrome

  • FemDx Medsystems Falloposcope Cleared

  • Cyclerion’s Mitochondrial Diseases Candidate Gets Orphan Drug Nod

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing