We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Drug Daily Bulletin
    • Drug Industry Daily
  • Device News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin Premium
  • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Drug Books
    • Device Books
  • Training/Events
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Form 483s Database
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • White Papers
  • CenterWatch
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Cerno Pharmaceuticals Hit With Warning Letter Over Adulterated Products

Cerno Pharmaceuticals Hit With Warning Letter Over Adulterated Products

June 1, 2018

The FDA slammed Cerno Pharmaceuticals for producing adulterated drugs at its Miami, Florida facility.

During a November 2017 inspection, the agency’s investigator found that the firm’s product, Verruguin wart remover, was manufactured using a salicylic acid before the component was tested and released for use by the quality unit.

In its response to the inspection observations, the firm said it would create a deviation report for using raw material before final release and train its staff in deviation reporting. But the agency said this was inadequate, noting that manufacturing drugs with untested components violates good manufacturing practices.

 “Reporting such incidents as deviations will not mitigate the failure to ensure that raw materials are withheld from use until they have been tested or examined, and then released by the quality unit,” the agency said.

The firm also failed to follow its equipment cleaning procedures. Major equipment was supposed to be wet cleaned on a set schedule, but the firm’s filling room records showed it did not perform the required cleanings.

The company said it would revise its procedures to ensure a major cleaning takes place before production if the equipment has not been used for an extended period, but the agency was not satisfied with this response.

“You failed to assess the effect of this deficiency on product quality. You also did not include your plan for how you will prevent this deficiency in the future,” the agency said. “In addition, your response…failed to define ‘extended period of time.’”

The FDA also noted that the facility did not have adequate equipment use logs for its blender and filler used to manufacture liquid products. It used combined “Room/Equipment Cleaning and Use Logs” to document cleaning and use, but the logs did not document who performed what operations and when.

View today's stories

Drugs Inspections and Audits

Upcoming Events

  • 04Apr

    Optimizing Quality Control Operations with Unified Quality

  • 12Apr

    The Participant Playbook Webinar Series, Part 3 — Rethinking the Development of Participant-Centric Clinical Trial Technology

  • 20Apr

    Medical Device Enforcement: Latest Developments from the FDA, DOJ and FTC

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 26Apr

    Building the Foundation for QMS AI

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • FDA Final Order Requires PMA for Spinal Spheres

  • FDA and Lupus Research Alliance Form Drug Development Consortium

  • GSK and Scynexis Ink Antifungal Licensing Deal Drug

  • FDA Clears Bot Image’s AI Software for Prostate Cancer Screening

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing