We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Drug Daily Bulletin
    • Drug Industry Daily
  • Device News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin Premium
  • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Drug Books
    • Device Books
  • Training/Events
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Form 483s Database
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • White Papers
  • CenterWatch
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Edge Biologicals Called Out for Inadequate Procedures, Recordkeeping

Edge Biologicals Called Out for Inadequate Procedures, Recordkeeping

July 27, 2018

Edge Biologicals was hit with a Form 483 for violations at its Memphis, Tennessee facility, including inadequate environmental monitoring, poor complaint handling and incomplete recordkeeping observed during a March inspection.

The FDA investigator noted the drugmaker failed to establish requirements for multiple environmental monitoring activities in aseptic filling operation areas. For example, it did not monitor the air or document temperature or humidity and it lacked methods for monitoring personnel and gowning processes.

The facility’s cleaning processes for controlled environment areas (a conveyor line, a high efficiency particulate air bench and a large conveyor room), did not have validated cleaning systems for aseptic processing. The firm also failed to validate sterilization of tubing sets used in aseptic fill operations for culture media devices.

The facility was also cited for poor handling of complaints it received in 2017. A summary of the year’s complaints indicated it received 47 contamination, 11 shipping, five performance and nine complaints related to other issues. But managers could only locate 23 complaint records for 2017.

In addition, three production employees had no documented training record and annual GMP training was not documented for any employees.

The investigator also found that quality audits were not adequate to determine whether the firm’s quality system activities complied with procedures. Specifically, the firm did not conduct quality audits to the frequency or scope required in its quality system internal audit program. In 2016 and 2017, only a single audit activity was performed.

View today's stories

Drugs Inspections and Audits

Upcoming Events

  • 04Apr

    Optimizing Quality Control Operations with Unified Quality

  • 12Apr

    The Patient Playbook Webinar Series, Part 3 — Rethinking the Development of Participant-Centric Clinical Trial Technology

  • 20Apr

    Medical Device Enforcement: Latest Developments from the FDA, DOJ and FTC

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 26Apr

    Building the Foundation for QMS AI

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • Surmodics Gets FDA’s Feedback on Rejected PMA

  • EU Approves Amicus Therapeutics Pombiliti for Late-Onset Pompe Disease

  • FDA Final Order Requires PMA for Spinal Spheres

  • FDA and Lupus Research Alliance Form Drug Development Consortium

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing