We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug & Device Products
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Publications
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • Books
  • Clinical Products
  • Advertising
  • White Papers
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » MedTech Europe: High-Risk Diagnostics Vulnerable in Shift to New In Vitro Device Regulations

MedTech Europe: High-Risk Diagnostics Vulnerable in Shift to New In Vitro Device Regulations

November 24, 2020

MedTech Europe said the implementation of the EU’s In Vitro Medical Device Regulation (IVDR) “has ground to a halt” due to the pandemic and the industry group is pressing the European Commission for assistance during the transition for high-risk diagnostic devices.

The high-risk Class D diagnostics are particularly vulnerable during the transition period because they need to complete their IVDR certification before May 26, 2022, as they don’t qualify for a grace implementation period for the IVDR that extends to May 27, 2024, the industry group said.

“Of serious concern is the fact that around 18 months away from IVDR date of application, the specific Class D conformity assessment infrastructure is limited or missing altogether,” MedTech Europe said.

View today's stories

Medical Devices Regulatory Affairs

Upcoming Events

  • 08Feb

    Process and Design Validation for Devicemakers: A Deep Dive into Best Practices, Recent Trends and Regulatory Definitions

  • 09Feb

    The Inextricable Link Between Data Integrity and Quality Culture

  • 15Feb

    Advanced Compliance Writing CAPA: Mastering Failure Investigation and Root Cause Analysis

  • 16Feb

    Fundamentals of FDA Inspection Management: Reduce Anxiety, Increase Inspection Success

  • 22Feb

    Best Practices for Developing and Maintaining a GxP Training Matrix

  • 07Mar

    FDA’s Remote Assessments v. Remote Interactive Evaluations: Do You Really Know the Difference?

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • Consortium Gets EU Funding to Develop Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring Device

  • FDA Approves GSK’s Oral Drug for Chronic Kidney Disease-Related Anemia

  • Aspivix’s Carevix Cleared to Reduce Pain, Bleeding in Gynecological Procedures

  • FDA Warns That Energy Supplement Contains Active Cialis Ingredient

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing