We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug & Device Products
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Publications
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • Books
  • Clinical Products
  • Advertising
  • White Papers
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » NEW GUIDELINES RECOMMEND BETTER MONITORING PROCESSES FOR IMPLANTABLE HEART DEVICES

NEW GUIDELINES RECOMMEND BETTER MONITORING PROCESSES FOR IMPLANTABLE HEART DEVICES

April 26, 2006

While pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to save lives, recent events have raised questions about their effectiveness and safety, Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) officials said recently. The organization has issued a series of recommendations for industry, the FDA and physicians to consider in revising the processes for postmarket surveillance and analysis of the devices.

Malfunctions in pacemakers and ICDs in the U.S., as well as the risk factors associated with ICD replacement in Canadian patients, point to the need for a more careful monitoring of the devices, according to results from two studies published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The HRS draft guidelines call for greater transparency in the postmarket surveillance, analysis and reporting of information, new systems to more quickly identify malfunctioning devices, and standardized formats and language on the part of industry to notify physicians and patients when a malfunction is identified (Full story will appear in the April 30 issue of Devices & Diagnostics Letter (http://www.fdanews.com/wbi/newsletters/device.html)).

KEYWORDS FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin

Upcoming Events

  • 08Sep

    Organizing Data and Document Archives: Finding a Needle in a Haystack for FDA Inspections

  • 15Sep

    Califf’s Post-PDUFA, Post-COVID FDA Agenda: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 20Sep

    Building a World-Class Pharmaceutical Advertising and Promotion Review Program

  • 21Sep

    The FDA’s Focus on Clinical Data Integrity Throughout Product Development and Approval

  • 22Sep

    FDA’s New Quality Management System Regulation: What the Proposed Harmonization with ISO 13485 Means for Devicemakers

  • 11Oct

    1st Annual Quality Management vSummit

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • AngioDynamics Gets Expanded Clearance for Auryon Atherectomy System

  • Aura Biosciences Receives Fast Track Designation for Bladder Cancer Candidate

  • FDA Issues Update on Becton Dickinson’s Recall

  • FDA Grants Accelerated Approval to Enhertu for HER2-Mutant NSCLC

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2022. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing