We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug & Device Products
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Publications
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • Books
  • Clinical Products
  • Advertising
  • White Papers
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Janssen Sues Mylan Over Generic Prezista

Janssen Sues Mylan Over Generic Prezista

July 31, 2014

Janssen Pharmaceuticals is suing Mylan over its bid to market a generic version of Janssen’s HIV drug Prezista.

Janssen claims that a generic of Prezista (darunavir) sought by Mylan’s ANDA in 75 mg, 150 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg and 600 mg doses would infringe the drug’s ‘829 patent. The patent expires in 2029, according to the complaint filed July 18.

Janssen and its predecessor, Tibotec, have spent years fending off generic challenges to Prezista’s various patents from generics firms such as Teva and Lupin. So far, the Orange Book lists Janssen as the only patent holder of Prezista’s active ingredient.

The current lawsuit also is Janssen’s second effort to protect Prezista from a Mylan generic. The parties are awaiting a decision on an earlier lawsuit alleging infringement by Mylan against Prezista’s ’411 patent, according to Janssen’s complaint.

Janssen parent Johnson & Johnson reported total Prezista sales of $1.7 billion in 2013. Mylan did not respond to a request for comment by press time. — Bryan Koenig

Originally appeared in Drug Industry Daily, the pharmaceutical industry’s number one source for regulatory news and information. Click here for more information.

Pharmaceuticals Commercial Operations

Upcoming Events

  • 13Jul

    FDA Ad and Promo Enforcement Trends: Past, Present and Future

  • 28Jul

    EU-MDR’s Growing Pains: Are You Current with the Latest Developments?

  • 28Jul

    Is Your Product a Drug or Device — and Does It Matter?: A Recent Appeals Court Decision Says It Does

  • 02Aug

    Medical Device Cybersecurity: Understand the Latest Developments

  • 03Aug

    Pharmaceutical Process Validation: Best Practices for Success

  • 10Aug

    Gene & Cell Therapy Regulation: Comparability and Other New Developments

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • FDA Provides Update on GE Healthcare’s Recall of Its Carescape R860 Ventilators

  • Gilead Resubmits NDA for Lenacapavir Following Complete Response Letter

  • FDA Warns Baby Neck Floats Used in Water Therapy Can Cause Death or Injury

  • U.S. Government Inks $3.2 Billion Contract With Pfizer-BioNTech for Vaccine Booster Campaign

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2022. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing