We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug Products
    • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Subscription Newsletters
    • Free Newsletters
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • Device Products
    • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Events
    • Form 483s Database
    • Subscription Newsletters
    • Free Newsletters
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • eCFR and Guidances
  • Clinical Products
  • Advertising
  • White Papers
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • COVID-19
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Bioequivalence Status to Granted to Perrigo's Testosterone Gel

Bioequivalence Status to Granted to Perrigo's Testosterone Gel

August 1, 2014

In a blow to AbbVie’s efforts to head off generic competition on its AndroGel 1%, the FDA said Irish drugmaker Perrigo’s testosterone gel product is bioequivalent and interchangeable.

Perrigo’s product has the same active ingredient, dosage form, route of administration and strength as AndroGel 1% (testosterone gel), the FDA said July 23 in response to AbbVie’s citizen petition that had sought a finding of non-equivalence, meaning it could not be swapped for the brand. Instead, the FDA gave Perrigo’s version an AB rating as safe to substitute.

The FDA also rejected AbbVie’s request for a requirement of additional rulemaking on bioequivalence before the FDA considered any AndroGel competitor. In addition, the agency rejected its request for a labelling change that said other topical testosterone products are not interchangeable with AndroGel. The FDA noted that versions of the product proposed by Perrigo and Teva already would be required to include warnings requested by AbbVie that testosterone gels may have different doses or application instructions.

Perrigo had originally submitted the drug as an ANDA but the FDA deemed there was need for additional clinical testing, and the company resubmitted the product under an NDA to perform that testing. Perrigo’s version passed those trials and became a generic as soon as the FDA granted it an AB rating, according to the company’s vice president for global regulatory affairs, Richard Stec.
The finding represents an important precedent, Stec said, affirming that drugs filed under NDAs can win an AB equivalence rating.

AbbVie’s petition was not entirely unsuccessful. While it now faces generic competition from Perrigo, the FDA sided with AbbVie in a parallel argument that sought a BX rating of non-equivalence for Teva’s testosterone gel. The difference between the generics products, the FDA found, is that Teva’s version fell outside of the range of bioequivalence during testing.

The petition’s finding also negates a lawsuit brought by Perrigo against the FDA in March that had sought a therapeutic equivalence finding to AndroGel from the agency. Perrigo dropped that lawsuit the day after the FDA issued its response to the citizen petition.

AndroGel is applied topically for men with low testosterone. AbbVie’s most recent earnings report lists the drug as one of its key products, having generated $218 million in sales in the second quarter of this year.

Perrigo had held off on marketing its version of AndroGel pending the AB rating, Stec said. The product can now go to market, although Perrigo did not give a possible timeline.

AbbVie said it was reviewing the decision and considering its next steps. — Bryan Koenig

Originally appeared in Drug Industry Daily, the pharmaceutical industry’s number one source for regulatory news and information. Click here for more information.

Pharmaceuticals Submissions and Approvals

Upcoming Events

  • 26Jan

    Reducing Complexity in Starting Clinical Trials – More Patients, Faster Startup

  • 27Jan

    Medical Device Clinical Trials in China: Latest Regulatory Developments

  • 27Jan

    FDA’s Response to COVID-19: Fundamentals of Obtaining Emergency Use Authorizations

  • 09Feb

    Maintaining Your Risk-Based Cleaning and Disinfectant Programs: Best Practices During COVID-19

  • 10Feb

    FDA Under the Biden Administration: What’s to Come and What It Will Mean

  • 11Feb

    Lab X.0: Addressing Quality and Compliance Challenges in Laboratory Operations in the COVID-19 All-Digital Era

Featured Products

  • Biological Risk Evaluation and Management for Medical Devices

  • GMP Inspection Preparation Checklist: A Tool for Internal Auditing

Featured Stories

  • Supreme Court Rejects Merck’s Appeal for $2.5 Billion Patent Verdict Reinstatement

  • FDA clears text

    FDA Clears SCC’s Transfusion-Management Software

  • CE mark

    MiRXES Earns CE Mark for COVID-19/Flu Test

  • KitePharma_Logo

    Kite Pharma’s Tecartus Gains UK Recommendation for Lymphoma

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Fax 703.538.7676 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2021. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing