We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept
  • SKIP TO CONTENT
  • SKIP NAVIGATION
  • Drug News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • GMPs, Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Drug Daily Bulletin
    • Drug Industry Daily
  • Device News
    • Trending
    • Commercial Operations
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • Research and Development
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin
    • FDAnews Device Daily Bulletin Premium
  • Books
    • FDAnews Books Library
    • Drug Books
    • Device Books
  • Training/Events
    • Webinar Training Pass
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Form 483s Database
    • FDA Approved Drugs
    • eCFR and Guidances
    • White Papers
  • CenterWatch
  • About Us
    • The Company
    • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » Expert Details How to Prepare for Data Integrity Portion of Inspection

Expert Details How to Prepare for Data Integrity Portion of Inspection

January 9, 2015

With the FDA stepping up scrutiny of data integrity during facility inspections, drugmakers must be ready to answer tough questions about their electronic record system, an inspections expert said.

The agency’s new focus in this area stems from a recent surge in findings of multiple data integrity violations at international manufacturers and suppliers. Common questions the FDA will ask on data integrity during an inspection include:

  • Where are the current and historical lists of who is authorized to access the system and enter/change data?
  • Are there written procedures for system and software validation, data collection and backups?
  • How are system and software changes controlled and does the company keep consistent records of any changes?
  • How are scans of paper records treated?
  • Is original data entered directly into an electronic record at the time of collection or are data transcribed from paper records into an electronic record? and
  • How is data transmitted from the manufacturer to its suppliers?

These aren’t detailed IT-type questions, but manufacturers need to have records that show the investigator how it is done, John Avellanet, managing director and principal at the consulting firm Cerulean Associates, told a recent FDAnews webinar on the topic.

For example, the standard operating procedure (SOP) should explicitly point out if the data is transcribed or entered directly into the electronic record, Avellanet said. In addition, an SOP needs to lay out what controls are in place to ensure that the data is accurately entered or transmitted to a supplier or business partner.

Examples of controls include whether the data is in an encrypted format, or the company verifies the record to ensure it is the correct size. All of those controls need to be documented and updated on an annual basis, Avellanet said.

An investigator will also determine if the company is in compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 if it keeps electronic records. Part 11 lays out the federal regulations for electronic records and signatures.

The investigator will at a minimum look to see if a company has a plan for achieving full compliance with Part 11 and is making progress on that plan, Avellanet said. Any electronic records must be readable, suitable for review and made available to the investigator.

Agency officials have also urged manufacturers to include data integrity when they audit suppliers. Poor data integrity controls are a sure-fire trigger for Form 483s, Avellanet added.

Stay up to date with the latest FDA news regarding inspections by subscribing to FDAnews Inspection Insider today!

Drugs Quality

Upcoming Events

  • 04Apr

    Optimizing Quality Control Operations with Unified Quality

  • 20Apr

    Medical Device Enforcement: Latest Developments from the FDA, DOJ and FTC

  • 25Apr

    Effective Root Cause Analysis and CAPA Investigations for Drugs, Devices and Clinical Trials

  • 26Apr

    FDA’s New Laws and Regulations: What Drug and Biologics Manufacturers Need to Know

  • 27Apr

    Califf’s FDA, 2023 and Beyond: Key Developments, Insights and Analysis

  • 17May

    2023 WCG Avoca Quality Consortium Summit

Featured Products

  • FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

    FDA’s New Quality System Regulation: Transitioning from QSR to ISO 13485

  • Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

    Selecting and Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in the EU

Featured Stories

  • GrayMatters Health’s Digital Therapy Device for PTSD Cleared

  • Dupixent Shows Positive Results in COPD Study

  • Advamedica’s Hemostat Cleared for Severe Surgical Bleeding

  • FDA Approves Sandoz’s Citrate-Free Adalimubab Formulation

The Revised ICH E8: A Guide to New Clinical Trial Requirements

Learn More
  • Drug Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • GMPs
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Device Products
    • Quality
    • Regulatory Affairs
    • QSR
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Postmarket Safety
    • Submissions and Approvals
    • Research and Development
    • Commercial Operations
  • Clinical Products
    • Trial Design
    • Data Integrity
    • GCP
    • Inspections and Audits
    • Transparency
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Data
Footer Logo

300 N. Washington St., Suite 200, Falls Church, VA 22046, USA

Phone 703.538.7600 – Toll free 888.838.5578

Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing